NewbieMouse
DIS Veteran
- Joined
- Apr 13, 2010
Awwwww, man.... Sad. This is a favourite for our family. We repeat the dialogue word for word during the year when we are missing DL.
I am turning 42. This isn't a generational thing. I am the demographic they're chasing for GotG as are my husband and my social circle. They're pursuing the comic geeks, there are lots of us and yes, we spend plenty of money.
I feel like throwing up. Universal builds a whole new Harry Potterland and Disney puts a seat cover on one its best rides. Cheap. I think that dangly ear lobe is messing with Joe's thinking. Just build a third gate you tight empty suits. Leave the good stuff alone.
This would've been great to turn Innoventions into something worth doing. Nah, lets ruin DCA instead.
Guardians of the Galaxy takes place in the present day, not in the future, so it doesn't really belong in Tomorrowland (although I suppose the same could be said of Star Tours, Submarine Voyage, and Autotopia).I am so disappointed in Disney right now. How does this fit the DCA theme? Oh, right, it doesn't. It fits...the Tomorrowland theme. That is all.
I am extremely bummed because Twilight Zone is one of my all time fave shows and I LOVE the ride and the themeing of the haunted hotel regardless if it is Twilight Zone or not. But the biggest thing I see is it just won't fit. They spent all that money to re-theme the park to the 20's and this just doesn't work. Personally I am not a huge superhero or marvel fan and I am fine with them having it but not replacing what is already there. I get that a lot of people like it and it will be nice for boys to have more things that cater to them (as well as girls) but one of the things I have always loved about Disney was the quaint old fashioned feeling of it. Having a futuristic area where it belongs like Tomorrowland or better a 3rd gate is awesome but trying to squeeze it in where it doesn't fit makes no sense to me.
You know, though, I'm also the target audience for this but I don't really like it. I'm an older comic book fan and love the GotG movie, but I also love the ToT (and The Twilight Zone in general) and the feel of the old Hollywoodland they had in that area of DCA.
Still, as long as they don't try this in DHS I'll be okay.
I'm pretty sure that Universal's Marvel rights don't include Guardians of the Galaxy (which is why they were able to show the "Guardians" preview in DHS in 2014). You can read the licencing deal at https://www.sec.gov/Archives/edgar/data/1262449/000119312510008732/dex1057.htmThey have to at this point. The Marvel theme park rights east of the Mississippi are Universal's.
Guardians of the Galaxy takes place in the present day, not in the future, so it doesn't really belong in Tomorrowland (although I suppose the same could be said of Star Tours, Submarine Voyage, and Autotopia).
Nice catch! Very interesting. (And also, darn! I was hanging my hat of hope on the fact Disney couldn't legally do this in WDW.) Indeed, I read they have already had the characters appear once in WDW (in 2014) so Guardians appears to be somewhat open for their use. Characters WDW appearance: http://www.insidethemagic.net/2014/...st-time-as-walt-disney-world-welcomes-marvel/I'm pretty sure that Universal's Marvel rights don't include Guardians of the Galaxy (which is why they were able to show the "Guardians" preview in DHS in 2014). You can read the licencing deal at https://www.sec.gov/Archives/edgar/data/1262449/000119312510008732/dex1057.htm
Basically, as long as they don't use the word "Marvel", Marvel can allow other parks to use any Marvel characters that Universal isn't actively using. The only restriction is that Disney couldn't do local advertisements for the ride in the Orlando area, they would have to be regional or national ad campaigns.
Sadly I had to pass. We had one day in Universal on our FL trip last year and it was all about Harry Potter. But now I DEFINITELY want to check it out!Well if you've experienced Marvel's Superhero Island it will be a hard act to follow.
You say it's a blah movie, yet it's one of the highest rated (based on RT critic reviews) movies in the Marvel Cinematic Universe, and one of the highest grossing ones as well. As for it being vulgar, wasn't any more then any other movie in the MCU. It's arguably considered by fans to be in the top 3 behind only the first Iron Man movie and the first Avengers movie.
And that's totally valid. My point was that, "oh, it's just for young people who don't spend money like I do" is not accurate. We're going with a group in December. Every single adult owns either an annual pass or DVC and we're planning to hit several of the nicer restaurants, use the kid's club, do our Christmas shopping... We're not teenagers doing it on the cheap. This may not be everyone's cup of tea but it's definitely not a matter of failing to cater to the higher paying clientele.
I'm pretty sure that Universal's Marvel rights don't include Guardians of the Galaxy (which is why they were able to show the "Guardians" preview in DHS in 2014). You can read the licencing deal at https://www.sec.gov/Archives/edgar/data/1262449/000119312510008732/dex1057.htm
Basically, as long as they don't use the word "Marvel", Marvel can allow other parks to use any Marvel characters that Universal isn't actively using. The only restriction is that Disney couldn't do local advertisements for the ride in the Orlando area, they would have to be regional or national ad campaigns.